DiigO
le 16.01.2014 à 09:46:18
de 193.50.71.234
Diigo
Card's author :
Frédéric Renier - SupAgro Florac
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
To begin with :
Online service which allows to find your favourite websites whatever internet-connected computer you are using.
Official website :
http://www.diigo.com
Tool's boxes :
Web Watch tools
Introduction :
Diigo allows to save anything which has an internet address (webpage, post, video, podcast, RSS, online picture...) in a database. It is a possible alternative to the use of web browser's bookmarks (also called favourites). Saving them is fine, but finding them again is even better. That is why each recorded bookmark will be defined by tags and a short description.
Requirements :
- Creation of your own Diigo Account.
- Understanding the interest of tagging an internet data.
Some practical uses :
- Record, characterize and classify your own bookmarks: to create an online database. Bookmarks can be public or private (in this case they can only be seen when you are logged into your Diigo account). It is possible to record a copy of the page (upload cache).
- Use Diigo as a web browser: for the index done by the community. We explore together all the bookmarks recorded by the Diigo community. The research functions are well developed.
- Post all the tags in a cloud: on a CMS (content management system) as a Wiki, a blog, …
- Create a RSS: for all the bookmarks from your Diigo account, for a tag in particular or for a body of tags (gathered in a list).
- Cooperate with others within a group: (public or private) to propose and comment resources. There are RSS for each group and it is possible to define a list of preferences for the group.
Using the tools :
- Create your own account and learn the basic :
- Include a Diigo toolbar in the browser
- Get trained to the use of the toolbar :
- Creating Diigo groups :
Going further :
- Using lists to generate easy copy paste html reports, proposing one's favourites (upright : play as web slides).
- Linking a Twitter account to Diigo, which allows to tweet some chosen bookmarks or to include one's favourite tweets in the Diigo account.
Advantages :
- The question of tags (deleting, modifying, adding) can be done easily on a whole group of bookmarks.
- Html export is very useful for the making of web watch deliverable.
Drawbacks :
Like all bookmarks managers, the creating of a list of tags requires rigour, see advices here page 26
Licence :
Proprietary software, Freemium
Using :
It could be easier but also more complicated
Setting up :
No setting up
InfobesityIAmGatienIAmInfobeseButILo
le 17.01.2014 à 16:46:31
de 193.50.71.234
Infobesity: I am Gatien, I am infobese but I look after myself
Card's author :
Gatien Bataille
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
Testimonies :
Last night, in the building behind the cultural centre
- Me: Good morning to all, I am Gatien and I am infobese
- Everyone: Good morning Gatien!
- Facilitator: Gatien, could you tell us about yourself?
- Me, after taking a deep breath: I am unconsciously passionate... I am terribly frustrated because I can't follow the flow of information that circulates in the world every day, every hour, every second. I was engaged in many networks and naturally curious, I read magazines, all the latest books, I listened to the radio…and until recently I could manage all this…then the Internet arrived. Twitter, podcasts, webzines, newsletters, Google alerts, RSS threads…the range of possibilities became wider and wider and with an even greater number of fascinating topics. At the beginning I was overjoyed, but then frustration gradually moved in…too much interesting information I could not keep track of, I read through it all but never with enough time to go in-depth. The joy of constantly swimming in a pool of information rapidly became a feeling of drowning.
- Facilitator: Gatien, how did you feel at that time?
- With a trembling voice: I was so frustrated...also enraged with myself because I couldn't follow the rhythm.
- Facilitator: Did you really think you could follow it all?
- Recovering: No, I quickly understood that even if I used all my neurons, it would be utterly impossible to face this gigantic wave which grew larger and larger by the day. It's an unpleasant feeling…I had secretly hoped to cope with it.
- Facilitator: So then what did you do?
- Me: Initially I tried to be more organised. I was convinced that I could overcome this small hiccup by being better organised. I sorted emails automatically in my inbox. I cancelled my subscription to several newsletters, I organised my RSS threads and would only open articles that seemed truly relevant, I cut down on Twitter…
- Facilitator: and…?
- Me: Well…there were some positive effects with this organisation. We could say it became manageable again.
- Facilitator: but you really don't look that satisfied?
- Me: I ended asking myself if infobesity wasn't actually a part of one's character...
- Facilitator: oh! Can you explain that?
- Me: The more I thought about it, the more I realised I was already infobese, even before the times of Internet. You know how books pile up next to your bed quicker than you can read through them…and this was before Internet. I think this innate curiosity, the desire to learn, makes one infobese. Then you try reducing this infobesity so that the level of frustration is reasonable. And then Internet doesn't exactly make things easy. Of course there is an abundance of information, but there is also an abundance of information in libraries…what made it different, for me, was serendipity…
- Facilitator: serendipity…I don't quite understand...
- Me: when I am surfing the net looking for information on a specific topic it is too easy, much too easy, to come across a new topic by chance that you know little or nothing about and that, oh God! You find interesting…and then the trap closes again; another interesting topic, so now I have two…a new person to follow on Twitter, then two…an RSS thread to follow, now it's two…it's no good choosing as you go, choices must be made at the start…and this is extremely complicated. Especially when curiosity comes by nature.
- Facilitator: What next?
- Me, again with a quivering voice: well, I am still infobese… I think I was able to limit the stress, but my frustration remains just as high. I have learnt to keep things in perspective, to "close the store" from time to time, to convince myself that if some information is really important, it will come back to me, to go with the flow rather than trying to chase it…I think it's a good start. There's still a long way to go but you will help me, won't you?
- All: Bravo Gatien, of course we will help you!
Some tips to manage infobesity
- Choosing what newsletters you subscribe to…Those you don't really read = into the trash bin
- Organising your inbox, set up an automatic sorting so that you only have important or urgent emails visible
- Limit your subscriptions to RSS threads to topics that you are really interested in
- Do not try to keep up with all RSS threads at whatever cost; threads older than 5 days are no longer "important" (in any case, it is up to you to choose which topics are important)
- Plan a moment during the day to manage your infobesity…during the rest of the day, organise your time so that you are not "bothered" by the flow of information
- Don't cause infobesity in others. Only re-scoop, re-tweet and re-send things that are really relevant
- Share your infobesity and find support in your friends and colleagues to reduce your own personal infobesity. If everyone searches a specific topic and chooses the relevant information and the work is shared, all group members will see their infobesity drop.
Internet link :
http://www.doyoubuzz.com/gatien-bataille
NetvibeS
le 16.01.2014 à 12:05:40
de 193.50.71.234
Netvibes
Card's author :
Outils Réseaux
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
To begin with :
Netvibes is an online service which enables to create a web portal that gathers RSS (It has other features but this one is the most interesting) : personally (web watch, control) or for a group, a project, a territory .
Official website :
http://www.netvibes.com
Tool's boxes :
Web Watch tools
Introduction :
Requirements :
Surfing the net
Some practical uses :
Using the tools :
Going further :
- Testing space : Official site
- Documentation : Netvibes Documentation
Advantages :
- Allows the creation of a very open and updated portal for a group, a territory. Enables to create your own personal online office where web watch can be centralized.
Drawbacks :
- It's an online service (is there a continuity of data ?), it is necessary to open an account.
Licence :
Proprietary software, Freemium
Using :
Easy
Setting up :
No setting up
PearltreeS
le 17.01.2014 à 18:11:58
de WikiAdmin
Pearltrees
Card's author :
Frédéric Renier, Supagro florac
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
To begin with :
Pearltrees allows organizing bookmarks in a tree-like form. It allows sharing favourites from the internet on a website. It allows benefiting from others' searches but also to organise collaborative searches.
Official website :
http://www.pearltrees.com
Tool's boxes :
Web Watch tools
Introduction :
Requirements :
Skills
- knowing how to browse the net
- knowing how to install an extension on your browser
- flash reader on your computer
Some practical uses :
- Sharing bookmarks
- Collaborative searches
- Social bookmarking
- Organising bookmarks
Using the tools :
Advantages :
- original presentation
- linked to Twitter and Facebook
- Widgets generation
Drawbacks :
- data cannot be imported or exported
- No RSS feed
Licence :
Proprietary software, Freemium
Using :
Easy
Setting up :
No setting up
RssFeedAndSyndication
le 14.01.2014 à 14:58:06
de 86.202.88.99
RSS feed and syndication
Card's author :
Outils-réseaux
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
Description :
What do this mysterious symbol and barbarian acronym mean?...
An RSS feed gives a summary of the latest information on a website: generally a title, a very brief description and a link to the original page with the information.
The RSS file is updated constantly: it contains all the latest published information.
There are two types of these:
Examples:
Syndication
Be careful with copyright!
Credits : ejk* on Flick CC-BY-SA
What is an RSS feed ?
Whether we call it "RSS feed" ("Rich Site Summary" or "Really Simple Syndication"), "RSS channel", "RSS thread", "information thread", the principle remains the same: it is a data format to disseminate updates of websites whose contents change very often (information websites, blogs...).An RSS feed gives a summary of the latest information on a website: generally a title, a very brief description and a link to the original page with the information.
The RSS file is updated constantly: it contains all the latest published information.
What is it used for?
There are two ways in which an RSS feed can be used:- for one's own personal information: to subscribe to and check all the latest information of websites from one single place, without having to visit all the sites. Essential for searches and to follow the activity of open cooperative devices and also to ensure an “ex-post” moderation…
- for a webmaster to syndicate content, which means publishing information coming from other websites automatically on a website. This is essential to grow the networks, and to avoid publishing the same information twice, to make one's site dynamic without becoming exhausted ;-)
RSS feed readers
To subscribe to an RSS feed individually one needs a specific tool called “RSS reader” or “RSS aggregator”There are two types of these:
- Workstation tools:
- Thunderbird:
- +: very easy to use, a simple interface, multi-platform (Mac, Windows, Linux), this software is more than a simple feed reader
- -: this software is more than a simple feed reader
- RSSowl :
- +: advanced functions, tag browsing, multi-platform (Mac, Windows, Linux)
- -: not always easy to use, slow (JAVA)
- Feedreader (Windows), NetNewsWire Lite (Mac), or Liferea (Linux)
- +: very easy to use, simple interface
- -: mono-platform (Mac OR Windows OR Linux)
- Akregator (Linux)
- Firefox
- Thunderbird:
- On-line tools:
- Netvibes
- iGoogle
Syndication
Generally speaking "content syndication" refers to the possibility of re-publishing on a website content from a different website, in theory automatically.Examples:
Syndication
- Tela Botanica , news site
- Educ-envir.org , news site
Be careful with copyright!
Credits : ejk* on Flick CC-BY-SA
SharedAndCollaborativeWebWatch
le 14.01.2014 à 13:35:05
de 86.202.88.99
Shared and collaborative web watch
Card's author :
Hélène Laxenaire - SupAgro Florac
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
Description :
The different stages of web watch :
There are different kinds of watch which vary according to the topic (legal, informative,...) and the objective (strategic watch where an eye is kept on competitors in order to position one's firm and products, creative watch on designers works in order to detect new trends, ...)
In all cases, watch is an iterative and continuous process
Examples of watched contents :
Collect information (together)
The most important point is the spreading : we agree on the content, on the selection of criteria of what is going to be brought to the collaborative watch, with all the participants. It may be the watch which interests the group and/or the watch aiming a specific audience.
It's the difference between the shared watch and the collaborative watch :
Stages of watch :
Canvassing is done through browsers, social bookmarking tools (Diigo, Pearltrees,...), newspapers, recommendations from colleagues, etc... But there is afterwards a constant revaluation of sources (addition, deletion) according to the watch's results : constant toing and froing.
In the model proposed by Jean-Michel Cornu : abundance/rarity/opportunity/constraint, web watch is located on the abundance's side, the abundance of information on the Internet.
(Crédit : Marc Lanssens - SupAgro Florac - CC By-Sa )
The winning strategy is therefore the opportunity strategy and not the planning strategy : I can't know in advance what information I will find, because the watch is exactly the supervision of news and weak signals. One must "try " sources and according to results modify them.
The struggling is to know where to start, where to find the right end of the thread. Indeed, as the watch gets structured and becomes more and more relevant, the different sources refer to other relevant sources. It is as if a bonus to the winner was given : the more evolved and structured the watch is, the easier it gets to improve it ! And suggestion algorithms proposed by watch tools (Google reader, Twitter) strengthen this paradox : the more relevant the sources already composing our watch are, the more numerous the sources automatically proposed get. In order to limit this pernicious effect, it is more interesting to start spotting sources used by watch on close topics rather than starting from a search engine. That is all the interest of shared web watch. This sentry has put on-line a RSS feeds aggregator on a theme close to mine, what are the sources he used ? I think relevant the web watch used by this user of Twitter, who is he following ? Who is he followed by ? So, gradually, groping along, one makes his own selection benefitting from the selection work already done by other sentries and adapting it to his own needs.
Materiality of the hardware medium (paper, magnetic tape, DVD,...) implies the resource's "rarity " : a billion books can't be published each time ! Information goes through define and limited channels (by materiality and/or regulations : the CSA attributes radio and television frequencies because they are in limited numbers, an efficient broadcasting of a book needs to be done by an editor (who will take a financial risk) who will go through a distributor to carry the books in well defined point of sale. And the work will need a legal deposit to the BNF. In conclusion, the low number of channels added to an information scene which has not changed for 30 years allows to have marks to easily evaluate information : name of the editor, of author, of the radio station, the kind of periodical and even the model of the periodical are often enough.
Evaluation is done from the authority : whether it is the one granted by the author or more often the publisher, the periodical which broadcasts or the radio or television channel to which it belongs
3.3.1.2 Web 2.0 or dilution of authority and classical marks
There is no publishing left for most contents. Hierarchization of information is often left to algorithms : hierarchy of results with search engines, linked videos on Youtube, etc.
More over, the data carrier, out of reality, is not restricted to only one identified source. Information coming automatically from several external sources (RSS feeds, nested pages) may be found on a single web page without it being obvious for the reader.
The data carrier enables collaborative writing, where the author is not know any more (Wikipedia) but also contents which are automatically generated through data bases : for a same research, an Amazon page will be different according to former researches, purchases already done, purchases done by other users, etc.
Opportunities given by the copy-paste function contributes to this dilution of authority. Some texts are made up of a collection (more or less successful) of other texts.
Primary sources : sites which contains articles. They are watched on through the site's feeds, web watch, subscription to newsletter publishing new publications.
Evaluation criteria :
3.3.2.2 Evaluation of secondary sources
Secondary sources : spotted and indicated articles through Twitter, Facebook, a shared web watch, a watch bulletin...
Evaluation criteria : the confidence given to the person who indicated the link.
(Little historical and informative digression:
we have been used to trusting information officer for the choice of selected and available documents : we rarely check the liability or the serious of a work from an information center, assuming that the document has been selected. When the Internet became mass appeal in the mid 90's, the pattern was applied to the web under the form of a directory listing and classifying web sites which were selected by humans (and nevertheless information officers). In front of the scale of the task and the improvement of selections done by search engine, non-specialized directories disappeared for the benefit of search engines. It's the beginning of the Google era when the confidence formerly given to human beings has been transferred to a research algorithm. Then Web 2 with social bookmarking or data curation tools but also web watch through social networks (particularly Twitter) reaffirmed the profit of selection.)
In this environment, shared space and/or collaborative web watch shows all its strength, because selection of information is done within the community of interest and then besides the relevance, it's the level of confidence that is high and which endows all its value to that kind of watch.
Spotting relevant sources thanks to tools, filtering, gathering and bringing them to us.
What is of interest for us should be spread on social networks and not what could potentially interest those who follow us because choice is subjective, this publishing is the capital gain of our web watch. Social networks are the place for an assumed subjectivity, its actual strength.
How to spread your web watch ?
1. What is web watch ?
It's a monitoring. In military terms , it's a sentry in night duty1.1 Definitions
"Know, plan and do ", detection of weak signalsThe different stages of web watch :
- Collect information
- Sort out, process information
- Spread to a chosen audience
- Decide according to the collected information
There are different kinds of watch which vary according to the topic (legal, informative,...) and the objective (strategic watch where an eye is kept on competitors in order to position one's firm and products, creative watch on designers works in order to detect new trends, ...)
In all cases, watch is an iterative and continuous process
- iterative : round trips between results and sources (and tools) so as to improve the watch's results with regard to its objectives. This round trip also allows to develop the watch compared with the development of or compared with the evolution peculiar to the topic of the watch (emergence of new themes in the watch's field for instance).
- continuous : watch is not an inventory of fixtures at a given time or a situation of art but a continuous process following current events or the development of topics.
1.2 An informative … and collaborative web watch
Within the framework of this course,we'll be interested in "informative " web watch.Examples of watched contents :
- The theme news
- Calendar of events, colloquium
- Similar group initiatives but in another environment (that brings in some fresh air)
- Research news
- Watch on new publications (bibliography)
- Collaborative initiatives
- Regulatory web watch (light)
- ....
Collect information (together)
- Sort out, process information (together)
- Spread to a chosen audience (to the group and beyond)
- Decide according to the collected information (rarely formalized for informative watch).
The most important point is the spreading : we agree on the content, on the selection of criteria of what is going to be brought to the collaborative watch, with all the participants. It may be the watch which interests the group and/or the watch aiming a specific audience.
It's the difference between the shared watch and the collaborative watch :
- shared watch : I do my watch according to my own criteria and I share it,
- collaborative watch : the group agrees on the topic of the watch and only feeds the collaborative watch about this topic.
2. What does web watch change ?
Watch is the processing of flow2.1 Before the Internet
Flows: radio, television, newspapersStages of watch :
- Collect : Subscription to newspaper and newsletter
- Sort out, process : press review, documentary file
- Spread : press review, provision of files
- Decide : summaries, reports
2.2 Now
New flows of information which add in to old ones :- RSS feeds
- Social networks
- Newsletters, mailing lists
- Emails
- Alarm system (on line services which alarm via an email or a RSS feeds when a new article comes out on chosen key-words)
- Website watch (enables to follow news from sites without feeds).
3. Set up a web watch
3.1 Define field and themes
3.2 Find sources
Finding the right sources is attempting the impossible in front of the profusion of information available on the Internet !Canvassing is done through browsers, social bookmarking tools (Diigo, Pearltrees,...), newspapers, recommendations from colleagues, etc... But there is afterwards a constant revaluation of sources (addition, deletion) according to the watch's results : constant toing and froing.
In the model proposed by Jean-Michel Cornu : abundance/rarity/opportunity/constraint, web watch is located on the abundance's side, the abundance of information on the Internet.
(Crédit : Marc Lanssens - SupAgro Florac - CC By-Sa )
The winning strategy is therefore the opportunity strategy and not the planning strategy : I can't know in advance what information I will find, because the watch is exactly the supervision of news and weak signals. One must "try " sources and according to results modify them.
The struggling is to know where to start, where to find the right end of the thread. Indeed, as the watch gets structured and becomes more and more relevant, the different sources refer to other relevant sources. It is as if a bonus to the winner was given : the more evolved and structured the watch is, the easier it gets to improve it ! And suggestion algorithms proposed by watch tools (Google reader, Twitter) strengthen this paradox : the more relevant the sources already composing our watch are, the more numerous the sources automatically proposed get. In order to limit this pernicious effect, it is more interesting to start spotting sources used by watch on close topics rather than starting from a search engine. That is all the interest of shared web watch. This sentry has put on-line a RSS feeds aggregator on a theme close to mine, what are the sources he used ? I think relevant the web watch used by this user of Twitter, who is he following ? Who is he followed by ? So, gradually, groping along, one makes his own selection benefitting from the selection work already done by other sentries and adapting it to his own needs.
3.3 Evaluate sources
3.3.1 Problematic of the evaluation
3.3.1.1 The hardware world : a known world where authority prevailsMateriality of the hardware medium (paper, magnetic tape, DVD,...) implies the resource's "rarity " : a billion books can't be published each time ! Information goes through define and limited channels (by materiality and/or regulations : the CSA attributes radio and television frequencies because they are in limited numbers, an efficient broadcasting of a book needs to be done by an editor (who will take a financial risk) who will go through a distributor to carry the books in well defined point of sale. And the work will need a legal deposit to the BNF. In conclusion, the low number of channels added to an information scene which has not changed for 30 years allows to have marks to easily evaluate information : name of the editor, of author, of the radio station, the kind of periodical and even the model of the periodical are often enough.
Evaluation is done from the authority : whether it is the one granted by the author or more often the publisher, the periodical which broadcasts or the radio or television channel to which it belongs
3.3.1.2 Web 2.0 or dilution of authority and classical marks
There is no publishing left for most contents. Hierarchization of information is often left to algorithms : hierarchy of results with search engines, linked videos on Youtube, etc.
More over, the data carrier, out of reality, is not restricted to only one identified source. Information coming automatically from several external sources (RSS feeds, nested pages) may be found on a single web page without it being obvious for the reader.
The data carrier enables collaborative writing, where the author is not know any more (Wikipedia) but also contents which are automatically generated through data bases : for a same research, an Amazon page will be different according to former researches, purchases already done, purchases done by other users, etc.
Opportunities given by the copy-paste function contributes to this dilution of authority. Some texts are made up of a collection (more or less successful) of other texts.
3.3.2 Evaluation criteria of sources on the web 2.0
3.3.2.1 Evaluation of primary sourcesPrimary sources : sites which contains articles. They are watched on through the site's feeds, web watch, subscription to newsletter publishing new publications.
Evaluation criteria :
- Authority : the author, the site editor : I keep an eye on the blog of such author who is specialist in …, I follow the feeds of the Whatnot Institute.
- External criteria (when neither the author or the editor of the site are known)
- intrinsic quality of the text
- consistence with what is already known
- vocabulary, text construction
- sources
3.3.2.2 Evaluation of secondary sources
Secondary sources : spotted and indicated articles through Twitter, Facebook, a shared web watch, a watch bulletin...
Evaluation criteria : the confidence given to the person who indicated the link.
(Little historical and informative digression:
we have been used to trusting information officer for the choice of selected and available documents : we rarely check the liability or the serious of a work from an information center, assuming that the document has been selected. When the Internet became mass appeal in the mid 90's, the pattern was applied to the web under the form of a directory listing and classifying web sites which were selected by humans (and nevertheless information officers). In front of the scale of the task and the improvement of selections done by search engine, non-specialized directories disappeared for the benefit of search engines. It's the beginning of the Google era when the confidence formerly given to human beings has been transferred to a research algorithm. Then Web 2 with social bookmarking or data curation tools but also web watch through social networks (particularly Twitter) reaffirmed the profit of selection.)
In this environment, shared space and/or collaborative web watch shows all its strength, because selection of information is done within the community of interest and then besides the relevance, it's the level of confidence that is high and which endows all its value to that kind of watch.
3.4 Classify and order one's watch
We are showered with information flows, sources are multiplying thanks to web 2, there is an overflowing, a flood, so to avoid drowning, we need to do a little plumbing...Spotting relevant sources thanks to tools, filtering, gathering and bringing them to us.
3.4.1 In practice : aggregate sources in the same spot : Padawan learner
Tools to aggregate feeds and/or flows from social networks :- all the flows : iGoogle, Google reader
- automatic publishing : Paper.li, Feedly
3.4.2 In practice : filter, reconstitute sources : Jedi apprentice
- Gather in one several flows
- Filterone or several flows to reconstitute another one (Yahoo Pipes)
- Create an new flow from a shared web watch (Delicious, Diigo)
- Connect several web 2 services (Itttf)
3.4.3 Recreate a human scale informative space in the web ocean
The risk of this sorting is to reach only what is know, comfortable without facing other opinions or visions. But here again, collaborative web watch helps us to avoid this pitfall :- sources are many (all the sources from all participants)
- But information is selected
- It's the opportunity with sources multiplicity (outer intelligence, aeration) without the weight of infobesity!
- Same thing with social networks but with less relevance (and therefore more noise)
- A serendipity that increases more on the internet than in the real world. And we must accept it !
3.5 Select to avoid drowning !
To avoid drowning and still find your way around, one must learn to evaluate information coming from secondary data : You must not read everything !3.5.1 Selection criteria
- Secondary data : title, comments, etc.
- Redundancy
- I read or not / I keep or not / I transfer or not
3.6 Spread without drowning others !
Beware of the "God will recognise his own people" syndrome. Don't send everything to everybody thinking : "they will select" or "there will surely be someone interested". The content and the audience of what is spread must be selected. The opposite is counterproductive. That is the great advantage of collaborative web watch, the audience is well known and identified. Only what is of interest for the group must be spread.What is of interest for us should be spread on social networks and not what could potentially interest those who follow us because choice is subjective, this publishing is the capital gain of our web watch. Social networks are the place for an assumed subjectivity, its actual strength.
How to spread your web watch ?
- Social Networks : retweet, sharing
- Creation of RSS feeds (Diigo, Delicious)
- PDF bulletin automatically generated from a flow : Zinepal
- Avoid newsletter-shaped email
- Collaborative web watch : use of a key-word specific to the group to redistribute the information which is especially dedicated to the group : Diigo, Scoop.it
4. Capitalize
4.1 Everything must not to be kept ! Change in position
Two logics :- Logic of collection : in a world of rarity, we try to gather everything in the same place (library). It's the world of paper backup.
- Logic of flow : in a world of abundance, tools and methods are implemented to spot interesting information. It's the world of online backup.
4.2 How ?
We know perfectly how to manage information coming from "former " channels : written mails, telephone, etc. We don't know yet how to manage the disproportionate e-arrival of information. A knowledge managing method has then to be implemented. They are many of them, the GTD method for instance can help. Must choose one method, whichever one. Once chosen, tools enable to implement it.5. But I don't have time !
- Automate all that can be.
- Define a time in your schedule for watch and respect it ! (i.e turn down if possible any meetings during this slot: "no, I am not available") If you decide to do your watch just when you don't have anything left to do, you'll never do it.
- Take advantage of others watch thanks to shared web watch !!
Focus on collaborative web watch
Gathering : indicate
- While doing your watch, spot what could be of interest for the community
- Key-words: Delicious, Diigo
- Hashtag : Twitter
- Sharing with a group : Facebook
- Use redundancy : Yahoo Pipes
Spreading
- RSS Feeds : aggregator, web site
- Scoop.it, Paper.li
- Facebook page
- Email (can be automatically generated by the feed)
- PDF (can be automatically generated by the feed)
Capitalization
- Scoop.it : key-word
- Delicious : stack
- Pearltrees
- Zotero
TwitteR
Twitter
Filter : autoformation
bureautique
cohérence
communication
Communiquer et échanger
complexité
concept
Concevoir et animer un projet
coopération
Créer/fonctionner en réseau
débat
Enseigner/former
formation courte
formation longue
heuristique
idées
ils l ont fait
initiation
méthode
Organiser et planifier
Organiser un évènement à plusieurs
outil
Outils-réseaux
Parcours animer un projet coopératif
Parcours animer un réseau
parcours ça fume
Parcours communiquer rendre visible son projet
Parcours court animer un projet coopératif
Parcours formateur 2.0
Parcours introduction coopération
Parcours rédiger publier
Parcours technique
Parcours veille collaborative
Parcours1
Parcours2
Parcours3
partage
Partager et construire collectivement des ressources
Partager et diffuser sa veille
Produire et gérer du contenu
publication
Télétravailler
Travailler ensemble et à distance
Veiller
Visualiser des données
le 16.01.2014 à 16:24:11
de WikiAdmin
Card's author :
Outils Réseaux
Card's type of licence :
Creative Commons BY-SA
To begin with :
Twitter is the chirps of birds, that's why the log is a little blue bird. Created in 2006; Twitter is a microblogging plateform: the equivalent of an SMS but on the internet. Tweets of 140 characters maximum can be sent and received.
Official website :
http://twitter.com/
Tool's boxes :
Blogs
Introduction :
Requirements :
Opening a Twitter account
Some practical uses :
- Communicating about a network's activities.
- Web watching with Twitter
Using the tools :
Going further :
Testing space : twitter.com
Documentation :
Documentation :
Advantages :
- A very quick and exponential propagation effect. With the system "follower/following" : creation of a much more flexible social network than with Facebook.
Drawbacks :
- Only 140 characters : no way to be profound.
- Written form and specific codes that can put off beginners : Twitter is more confidential than Facebook
Licence :
Proprietary software, Free
Using :
Easy
Setting up :
No setting up